[Nitro CLI] Add fusion upload command by tobias-tengler · Pull Request #9036 · ChilliCream/graphql-platform

tobias-tengler · 2026-01-09T09:32:30Z

No description provided.

Copilot

Pull request overview

This pull request adds a new fusion upload command to the Nitro CLI for uploading source schemas for later composition. The PR also standardizes option naming by renaming --fusion-archive to --archive throughout the codebase and refactors composition logic for better code reuse.

Changes:

Adds new fusion upload command for uploading source schemas
Renames --fusion-archive option to --archive with backwards-compatible alias
Refactors composition logic into reusable helper methods
Updates configuration file naming from Directory.Build.props.user to Directory.Build.user.props

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 26 out of 31 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
`FusionUploadCommand.cs`	New command for uploading source schemas to Nitro Cloud
`FusionPublishCommand.cs`	Major refactoring to support multiple input modes (archive, source files, source identifiers)
`FusionPublishHelpers.cs`	Added helper methods for downloading source schemas and composition
`FusionValidateCommand.cs`	Updated to support both archive files and source schema files
`FusionComposeCommand.cs`	Refactored to extract reusable source schema reading logic
`FusionArchiveFileOption.cs`	New option replacing `ConfigurationFileOption` with backwards-compatible alias
Various option classes	New option classes for improved modularity
`schema.graphql`	Updated with new types and mutation for upload functionality
Test files	Updated to use new `--archive` option name

Files not reviewed (1)

src/Nitro/CommandLine/src/CommandLine/Properties/CommandLineResources.Designer.cs: Language not supported

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

github-actions · 2026-01-21T17:17:47Z

🚀 Fusion Gateway Performance Results

Simple Composite Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
5812.38 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.81ms	7.16ms	162.14ms	8.45ms	13.04ms	19.00ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
4519.24 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.75ms	38.67ms	258.25ms	49.06ms	110.83ms	129.57ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
      }
    }
  }
}

Deep Recursion Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
271.50 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
12.32ms	174.23ms	619.58ms	178.71ms	224.78ms	247.52ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
305.43 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
3.05ms	665.15ms	1718.04ms	690.80ms	1390.62ms	1517.21ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  users {
    ...User
    reviews {
      ...Review
      product {
        ...Product
        reviews {
          ...Review
          author {
            ...User
            reviews {
              ...Review
              product {
                ...Product
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
        reviews {
          ...Review
          product {
            ...Product
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Variable Batching Throughput

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
23889.01 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.09ms	1.69ms	39.52ms	2.04ms	3.89ms	4.75ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
18726.68 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.09ms	9.18ms	100.62ms	11.29ms	23.36ms	28.34ms

Executed Query

query TestQuery_8f7a46ce_2(
  $__fusion_1_upc: ID!
  $__fusion_2_price: Long!
  $__fusion_2_weight: Long!
) {
  productByUpc(upc: $__fusion_1_upc) {
    inStock
    shippingEstimate(weight: $__fusion_2_weight, price: $__fusion_2_price)
  }
}

Variables (5 sets batched in single request)

[
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "1", "__fusion_2_price": 899, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "2", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "3", "__fusion_2_price": 15, "__fusion_2_weight": 20 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "4", "__fusion_2_price": 499, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "5", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 }
]

No baseline data available for comparison.

Run 21218305284 • Commit afba3ac • Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:17:46 GMT

github-actions · 2026-01-23T14:18:53Z

🚀 Fusion Gateway Performance Results

Simple Composite Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
5865.12 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.81ms	7.14ms	161.31ms	8.37ms	13.10ms	18.80ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
4492.76 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.87ms	38.48ms	250.88ms	49.35ms	110.59ms	129.01ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
      }
    }
  }
}

Deep Recursion Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
272.06 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
12.57ms	173.89ms	562.89ms	178.12ms	224.19ms	245.84ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
303.89 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
3.04ms	691.92ms	1717.12ms	695.82ms	1380.97ms	1458.35ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  users {
    ...User
    reviews {
      ...Review
      product {
        ...Product
        reviews {
          ...Review
          author {
            ...User
            reviews {
              ...Review
              product {
                ...Product
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
        reviews {
          ...Review
          product {
            ...Product
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Variable Batching Throughput

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
24033.67 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.09ms	1.67ms	43.72ms	2.03ms	3.87ms	4.72ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec	Error Rate
19118.75 req/s	0.00%

📊 Response Time Metrics

Min	Med	Max	Avg	P90	P95
0.09ms	9.02ms	103.78ms	11.08ms	22.94ms	27.86ms

Executed Query

query TestQuery_8f7a46ce_2(
  $__fusion_1_upc: ID!
  $__fusion_2_price: Long!
  $__fusion_2_weight: Long!
) {
  productByUpc(upc: $__fusion_1_upc) {
    inStock
    shippingEstimate(weight: $__fusion_2_weight, price: $__fusion_2_price)
  }
}

Variables (5 sets batched in single request)

[
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "1", "__fusion_2_price": 899, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "2", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "3", "__fusion_2_price": 15, "__fusion_2_weight": 20 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "4", "__fusion_2_price": 499, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "5", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 }
]

No baseline data available for comparison.

Run 21287643068 • Commit 90cecc2 • Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:18:52 GMT

codecov · 2026-01-23T15:37:51Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (55b9a4c) to head (cffabc8).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@     Coverage Diff      @@
##   main   #9036   +/-   ##
============================
============================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

tobias-tengler force-pushed the tte/fusion-upload-command branch from 25edaf9 to d4094f4 Compare January 11, 2026 16:25

tobias-tengler force-pushed the tte/fusion-upload-command branch from 7f7c30d to c2be144 Compare January 21, 2026 07:52

tobias-tengler marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 16:56

tobias-tengler force-pushed the tte/fusion-upload-command branch from d5f8887 to 13db0d3 Compare January 21, 2026 16:56

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 21, 2026 16:56

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of tobias-tengler January 21, 2026 16:57 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Jan 21, 2026

View reviewed changes

tobias-tengler added 9 commits January 23, 2026 14:22

WIP: Add fusion upload command

93a224b

Use FusionSourceSchemaArchive

f1be3d0

Use correct mutation

77a4cd9

wip

f2c2b5d

Fix local Nitro configuration

5e183f5

WIP: Add support for publishing source schemas by name

73b399b

Align options and support source schemas in validate command

a11a2fc

Cleanup

56e25c7

Cleanup 2

cffabc8

tobias-tengler force-pushed the tte/fusion-upload-command branch from 13db0d3 to cffabc8 Compare January 23, 2026 13:22

tobias-tengler merged commit 08adb1d into main Jan 23, 2026
116 checks passed

tobias-tengler deleted the tte/fusion-upload-command branch January 23, 2026 15:37

This was referenced Jan 26, 2026

deps(nuget): Bump the hotchocolate group with 10 updates nexamediaserver/server#142

Closed

deps(nuget): Bump the analyzers group with 2 updates nexamediaserver/server#144

Closed

dependabot bot mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2026

deps(nuget): Bump the hotchocolate group with 10 updates nexamediaserver/server#158

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

[Nitro CLI] Add fusion upload command#9036

[Nitro CLI] Add fusion upload command#9036
tobias-tengler merged 9 commits intomainfrom
tte/fusion-upload-command

tobias-tengler commented Jan 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Comments

Uh oh!

Conversation

tobias-tengler commented Jan 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🚀 Fusion Gateway Performance Results

Simple Composite Query

Deep Recursion Query

Variable Batching Throughput

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

🚀 Fusion Gateway Performance Results

Simple Composite Query

Deep Recursion Query

Variable Batching Throughput

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Comments

tobias-tengler commented Jan 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading